Experiment
When can a smaller model take over?
Agreement with a frontier model measures agreement with a fallible teacher. This experiment examines how the teacher's own errors affect the decision to hand work to a local model.
Read the experimentI work on the decisions around software: what to build, what a mistake costs, and when a system has earned more independence.
A false alarm and a missed case rarely cost the same. The Dollarized Confusion Matrix turns those costs into a decision threshold.
Watch the decision play outAssumes calibrated probabilities and fixed error costs. Correct decisions have zero assigned value in this example.
Change either cost to see why accuracy alone cannot tell you where to set it.
Open the full calculator200 hypothetical cases. Move the cutoff to trade false alarms for misses.
75 true negatives
Actual: no25 false positives
Actual: no25 false negatives
Actual: yes75 true positives
Actual: yesSame cost as the 50% cutoff. 50 errors; 75% accuracy.
200 constructed cases, not customer data or a forecast. Ten groups of 20 have probabilities of 5%, 15%, up to 95%; each has exactly the corresponding fraction of actual positives. Half the cases are positive overall. Your model may have a very different mix.
We flag scores at or above the cutoff. Dots keep their actual outcome as they move. Dollar totals count false alarms and misses, minus any assigned value of correct decisions. Negative net cost means net benefit.
The cost-based cutoff uses calibrated probabilities and fixed per-case costs. Finite groups make the counts change in steps; several cutoffs can produce the same decisions. This is an illustration of the trade-off, not evidence of savings on real work.
Experiment
Agreement with a frontier model measures agreement with a fallible teacher. This experiment examines how the teacher's own errors affect the decision to hand work to a local model.
Read the experimentEssay and interactive figures
A regression and a randomized experiment can report the same elasticity. They support different decisions. The Nature of Knowledge follows that distinction through the claims a model can justify.
Explore the essayPublished draft, still being revised
What earlier technology transitions suggest about turning recurring knowledge work into owned software pipelines.
Every sufficiently advanced technology collapses one friction and reveals the new scarcity behind it. LLMs collapsed the cost of language, putting commodity intellectual output in the blast radius. A 6-step protocol, calibrated on 700 years of transitions from the printing press to the internet, for finding the new scarcity and moving first.
AI made production cheap and revealed the constraint it was hiding: selection. Green dashboards stay green while quality quietly decays. A 30-minute protocol to find your new scarcity.
I lead a technology organization spanning 13 retail brands. If you're interested in working together, write to me.
All of this is one graph. The curated layer up top is hand-built; the dense graphs below are the working substrate. They cross-reference. Eventually they live in one searchable space.
Larger working substrates. Each node is a lesson; edges are prerequisites and cross-graph references. Less polished than the curated layer - this is how I keep my own map.