Etym.From a literal maritime taunt, recycled by management consultants in the 1990s as a pithy metaphor for impractical mandates, see R. Camden, Corporate Lexicons, 1998.

A rhetorical maneuver that reframes a solvable issue as an all-encompassing, impractical project to obscure specifics, stall decisions, and share blame.

'We are not going to boil the ocean this quarter', Q3 Board Deck, slide 12

Etym.From L. scala, 'ladder', repurposed into corporate parlance circa 2010 by a consulting associate who needed a word that implied growth without immediate budgeting, see Henley, Corporate Metaphors, 2014.

To defer investment decisions and accountability by framing operational expansion as an inevitable future state rather than a present cost.

'We will scale next quarter' - Q3 Board Deck, slide 12

Etym.from L. synergia, 'working together', revived in corporate English during the 2000s to supply a quantifiable-sounding cover for merger rhetoric; see E. Mallory, Journal of Corporate Rhetoric, 2011.

A deliberately vague noun deployed to claim added value from loosely related assets, thereby permitting assertions without metrics or timelines.

'We should prioritize synergy across products and partnerships' - Q3 Board Deck, slide 12

Etym.from mid-20th-century aviation jargon, repurposed in early 21st-century venture discourse to quantify company survival in investor communications, see Sommers, Venture Language, 2011.

A single-number projection, expressed in months of funded operation, that reduces cash on hand and burn rate to a negotiable timeframe used to justify spending, hiring, or fundraising.

'We need to extend runway by 12 months to hit the growth inflection' - Q2 Board Deck, slide 12