Double and triple integrals. Volume under surfaces.
Multi-session curriculum - substantial prior knowledge and complex material. Use mastery gates and deliberate practice.
A single integral adds up “infinitesimal strips” to measure area. Multiple integrals do the same thing in higher dimensions: they add up “infinitesimal patches” (dA) or “infinitesimal boxes” (dV) to measure volume, mass, probability, and more—over regions whose shapes can be rectangles, disks, triangles, or curved solids.
A double integral ∬_D f(x,y) dA accumulates f over a 2D region D; a triple integral ∭_E f(x,y,z) dV accumulates f over a 3D region E. You compute them by choosing an order (dx dy, dy dx, …), translating the region’s boundaries into limits, and integrating iteratively. When f = 1, the integral returns area (2D) or volume (3D); when f is density, it returns mass.
A definite integral
∫ₐᵇ g(x) dx
is best understood as an accumulation process: you slice the x-interval into tiny widths Δx, evaluate g on each slice, and add up g(xᵢ)Δx. In the limit as Δx → 0, that sum becomes a single number: the signed area under g.
In many real problems, “one coordinate isn’t enough.” You might want:
In each case, you’re adding up contributions over a region in 2D or 3D, not just an interval.
A double integral is the limit of sums over tiny rectangles (or more general shapes) in a region D ⊂ ℝ².
Partition D into small pieces with area ΔAᵢ. Pick a sample point (xᵢ, yᵢ) in each piece. Then form a sum:
∑ f(xᵢ, yᵢ) ΔAᵢ
If the limit exists as the partition is refined (max ΔAᵢ → 0), we define
∬_D f(x,y) dA = lim ∑ f(xᵢ, yᵢ) ΔAᵢ.
Similarly, a triple integral adds over tiny boxes in a region E ⊂ ℝ³:
∭_E f(x,y,z) dV = lim ∑ f(xᵢ, yᵢ, zᵢ) ΔVᵢ.
The symbols dA and dV are reminders of the “infinitesimal piece” you’re summing.
It is tempting to treat dx dy as algebraic factors—and in computations it often behaves that way—but conceptually it stands for the limiting area of a tiny patch.
In one variable, ∫ can be negative if the function is below the axis. The same is true here:
If f(x,y) = 1, then
⎧ ∬_D 1 dA = Area(D)
⎨
⎩ ∭_E 1 dV = Volume(E)
This is a powerful check: if your limits describe the wrong region, your “area/volume of 1” will come out wrong.
A multiple integral returns one number. You can interpret it as:
1) Geometric accumulation: volume under a surface (2D region) or hypervolume (higher dimensions)
2) Total quantity: if f is a density (mass/area, mass/volume, probability density, etc.), the integral gives the total amount.
In many applications, the main challenge is not the integration itself—it’s correctly describing the region D or E and choosing a convenient differential element.
In single-variable integrals, the interval [a,b] is straightforward. In multiple integrals, the region can be:
Your goal is to translate a geometric description of D (or E) into limits of integration.
Many 2D regions can be described in two common ways.
Type I (x-simple):
D = { (x,y) : a ≤ x ≤ b, g₁(x) ≤ y ≤ g₂(x) }
Then
∬_D f(x,y) dA = ∫ₓ=aᵇ ∫ᵧ=g₁(x)^{g₂(x)} f(x,y) dy dx.
Type II (y-simple):
D = { (x,y) : c ≤ y ≤ d, h₁(y) ≤ x ≤ h₂(y) }
Then
∬_D f(x,y) dA = ∫ᵧ=cᵈ ∫ₓ=h₁(y)^{h₂(y)} f(x,y) dx dy.
Same region, different descriptions. The choice can make the integral easy or miserable.
A reliable workflow:
1) Sketch D (even roughly).
2) Decide an order (dy dx or dx dy).
3) For the inner variable, draw a vertical or horizontal line through the region.
4) Find where that line enters and exits the region: those are the inner bounds.
5) The outer bounds are the range over which that line actually intersects D.
Suppose D is the region between y = x² and y = 2x for x ≥ 0. Intersections:
x² = 2x
x² − 2x = 0
x(x − 2) = 0 ⇒ x = 0, 2
If you integrate with dy first (vertical slices):
0 ≤ x ≤ 2,
x² ≤ y ≤ 2x.
So
∬_D f dA = ∫₀² ∫_{x²}^{2x} f(x,y) dy dx.
If you reverse order (horizontal slices), you must solve for x in terms of y:
y = x² ⇒ x = √y (since x ≥ 0)
y = 2x ⇒ x = y/2
But the left/right boundary switches depending on y. You’d need to split into ranges where y/2 ≤ √y (and check where they meet).
That’s the typical pattern: reversing order can require piecewise integrals.
In Cartesian coordinates:
So dA = dx dy.
This becomes especially meaningful later in other coordinate systems (polar, cylindrical, spherical), where the “tiny patch” is not a rectangle. Even in Cartesian coordinates, it helps to remember that dA represents shape and scale of the local patch.
| Goal | Prefer dy dx when… | Prefer dx dy when… |
|---|---|---|
| Simpler bounds | Region is easily described by vertical slices | Region is easily described by horizontal slices |
| Integrand easier | Integrating f with respect to y is simple | Integrating f with respect to x is simple |
| Avoid splitting | One order yields single-range bounds | The other order forces piecewise bounds |
For triple integrals, the same ideas extend, but you now have three variables and nested bounds.
A common pattern is a “z-simple” solid:
E = { (x,y,z) : (x,y) ∈ D, z₁(x,y) ≤ z ≤ z₂(x,y) }
Then
∭_E f(x,y,z) dV = ∬_D
\left( ∫_{z=z₁(x,y)}^{z₂(x,y)} f(x,y,z) dz \right) dA.
In Cartesian coordinates, dV = dx dy dz (in some order). Geometrically, you’re summing tiny boxes with volume dx·dy·dz.
If E is between two surfaces z = z₂(x,y) (top) and z = z₁(x,y) (bottom), then for each (x,y) in the base region D you have a vertical segment of height z₂ − z₁. You can think:
Volume(E) = ∬_D (z₂(x,y) − z₁(x,y)) dA
because that’s exactly ∭_E 1 dV with dz integrated out first:
∭_E 1 dV
= ∬_D \left( ∫_{z₁}^{z₂} 1 dz \right) dA
= ∬_D (z₂ − z₁) dA.
That identity is one of the most useful bridges between 2D and 3D integration.
The double integral is defined via a 2D limiting process, but in practice we compute it using iterated integrals (one integral inside another). Under mild conditions (e.g., f continuous on a nice region), Fubini’s Theorem tells us we can compute
∬_D f(x,y) dA
by integrating in one variable and then the other, provided the bounds correctly describe D.
So computation becomes familiar: it’s just repeated single-variable integration.
Take
∬_D f(x,y) dA = ∫ₓ=aᵇ ∫ᵧ=g₁(x)^{g₂(x)} f(x,y) dy dx.
Read it as:
1) For a fixed x, integrate f(x,y) with respect to y from y = g₁(x) to y = g₂(x).
2) The result is a function of x.
3) Integrate that result from x = a to x = b.
The inner integral treats the “outer variable” as a constant.
If f(x,y) = x y² + 3x, then when integrating with respect to y:
∫ (x y² + 3x) dy
= x ∫ y² dy + 3x ∫ 1 dy
= x \left( y³/3 \right) + 3x(y)
= (x/3) y³ + 3xy.
The key move is recognizing x is constant during dy integration.
If f(x,y) ≥ 0 and D is a region in the plane, then
Volume under z = f(x,y) above D = ∬_D f(x,y) dA.
Why? Because above each small patch ΔA, the “column” has base area ΔA and height f(xᵢ,yᵢ), so volume contribution is approximately f(xᵢ,yᵢ)ΔA.
In 3D, if ρ(x,y,z) is a density (mass per unit volume), then total mass is
Mass = ∭_E ρ(x,y,z) dV.
Again, each tiny box has mass approximately ρ(xᵢ,yᵢ,zᵢ)ΔV.
Changing dx dy to dy dx is not a symbolic swap. It means:
This is where many mistakes happen: the integrand stays the same, but the bounds must be rewritten to describe the same region.
If you’re unsure whether your bounds match the region, compute ∬_D 1 dA.
This is the fastest debugging tool for region setup.
1) Rectangle: a ≤ x ≤ b, c ≤ y ≤ d
∬_D f dA = ∫ₐᵇ ∫_c^d f(x,y) dy dx
2) Between curves y = g₁(x) and y = g₂(x):
∬_D f dA = ∫ₐᵇ ∫_{g₁(x)}^{g₂(x)} f(x,y) dy dx
3) Between surfaces z = z₁(x,y) and z = z₂(x,y):
∭_E f dV = ∬_D ∫_{z₁(x,y)}^{z₂(x,y)} f(x,y,z) dz dA
In an iterated integral, the differential at the end is a reminder of the order:
So the pair (bounds, differential order) must match.
A helpful habit: when you write
∫ₓ=aᵇ ∫ᵧ=g₁(x)^{g₂(x)} f(x,y) dy dx
say out loud: “dy then dx.” This prevents accidental mismatches like writing y-bounds that depend on y (nonsense) or forgetting which variable is currently being integrated.
As noted earlier:
Area(D) = ∬_D 1 dA
Volume(E) = ∭_E 1 dV
And for a solid under z = f(x,y) above base D (with f ≥ 0):
Volume = ∬_D f(x,y) dA.
This is the “volume under surfaces” story that motivates double integrals.
If a lamina (thin plate) occupies D and has density ρ(x,y) (mass per unit area), then
Mass = ∬_D ρ(x,y) dA.
If a 3D object occupies E with density ρ(x,y,z) (mass per unit volume), then
Mass = ∭_E ρ(x,y,z) dV.
These formulas are identical in structure to area/volume, but the integrand now encodes material variation.
In 1D, the average value of g on [a,b] is (1/(b−a))∫ₐᵇ g(x) dx.
In 2D, the average value of f on region D is
f_avg = (1/Area(D)) ∬_D f(x,y) dA.
In 3D, the average value of f on region E is
f_avg = (1/Volume(E)) ∭_E f(x,y,z) dV.
This is a common use in physics (average temperature, average density) and probability (expected values with densities).
If (X,Y) has joint density p(x,y) over D, then
P((X,Y) ∈ D) = ∬_D p(x,y) dA.
And for expectations, you integrate the quantity of interest times density:
E[g(X,Y)] = ∬ g(x,y) p(x,y) dA.
Even if you haven’t studied probability yet, it’s helpful to recognize that the same accumulation logic powers it.
Many regions (disks, cylinders, spheres) are awkward in Cartesian bounds but simple in polar/cylindrical/spherical coordinates. In those systems, the differential element changes (e.g., dA = r dr dθ), which is fundamentally the same “infinitesimal patch” idea.
So mastering regions + iterated integrals in Cartesian coordinates sets you up to understand Jacobian factors later: the scaling needed when your tiny patch is a wedge or shell rather than a rectangle.
Multiple integrals are also the foundation for:
Those topics reuse the same mental pattern: define a region, identify the correct differential element, and accumulate.
Compute ∬_D (x + y) dA where D is the region bounded by y = x² and y = 2x for 0 ≤ x ≤ 2.
Step 1: Describe the region D.
We are told D is between y = x² (lower curve for 0≤x≤2) and y = 2x (upper curve).
So a convenient Type I description is:
0 ≤ x ≤ 2,
x² ≤ y ≤ 2x.
Step 2: Write the iterated integral (dy then dx).
∬_D (x + y) dA
= ∫₀² ∫_{y=x²}^{2x} (x + y) dy dx.
Step 3: Compute the inner integral with respect to y.
Treat x as constant:
∫ (x + y) dy
= ∫ x dy + ∫ y dy
= xy + y²/2.
Evaluate from y = x² to y = 2x:
[xy + y²/2]_{x²}^{2x}
= (x(2x) + (2x)²/2) − (x(x²) + (x²)²/2)
= (2x² + 4x²/2) − (x³ + x⁴/2)
= (2x² + 2x²) − x³ − x⁴/2
= 4x² − x³ − x⁴/2.
Step 4: Integrate the result over x from 0 to 2.
∫₀² (4x² − x³ − x⁴/2) dx
= ∫₀² 4x² dx − ∫₀² x³ dx − (1/2)∫₀² x⁴ dx
Compute each:
∫ 4x² dx = 4·(x³/3)
∫ x³ dx = x⁴/4
∫ x⁴ dx = x⁵/5
So
= [4x³/3 − x⁴/4 − (1/2)(x⁵/5)]₀²
= [4x³/3 − x⁴/4 − x⁵/10]₀².
Step 5: Evaluate at x = 2.
4x³/3 = 4·8/3 = 32/3
x⁴/4 = 16/4 = 4
x⁵/10 = 32/10 = 16/5
So value = 32/3 − 4 − 16/5.
Put over common denominator 15:
32/3 = 160/15
4 = 60/15
16/5 = 48/15
Result = (160 − 60 − 48)/15 = 52/15.
Insight: Most of the work was not “integration tricks”—it was correctly encoding the region as x² ≤ y ≤ 2x. Once the bounds match the geometry, the computation becomes routine.
Find the volume of the solid E over the rectangle D = { (x,y): 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, 0 ≤ y ≤ 2 } between z = 0 and z = 3 + x + y.
Step 1: Recognize this is a stacked solid.
For each (x,y) in the base D, z runs from bottom z₁ = 0 to top z₂ = 3 + x + y.
Step 2: Write volume as ∭_E 1 dV and integrate dz first.
Volume = ∭_E 1 dV
= ∬_D \left( ∫_{z=0}^{3+x+y} 1 dz \right) dA.
Step 3: Compute the inner integral.
∫₀^{3+x+y} 1 dz = (3 + x + y) − 0 = 3 + x + y.
Step 4: Convert to a double integral over the rectangle.
Since D is rectangular, dA = dx dy is simple:
Volume = ∬_D (3 + x + y) dA
= ∫ₓ=0^1 ∫ᵧ=0^2 (3 + x + y) dy dx.
Step 5: Integrate with respect to y.
Treat x as constant:
∫₀² (3 + x + y) dy
= [ (3 + x)y + y²/2 ]₀²
= (3 + x)·2 + 4/2
= 2(3 + x) + 2
= 6 + 2x + 2
= 8 + 2x.
Step 6: Integrate with respect to x.
∫₀¹ (8 + 2x) dx
= [8x + x²]₀¹
= 8 + 1
= 9.
Insight: A triple integral can collapse quickly if you choose the natural order. Here, integrating dz first turns the 3D volume problem into a 2D area accumulation of the height (3 + x + y).
A plate occupies D = { (x,y): 0 ≤ x ≤ 2, 1 ≤ y ≤ 3 } with density ρ(x,y) = x y. Find the mass.
Step 1: Set up mass as a double integral.
Mass = ∬_D ρ(x,y) dA = ∬_D x y dA.
Step 2: Use the rectangular bounds.
Mass = ∫₀² ∫₁³ x y dy dx.
Step 3: Integrate with respect to y.
x is constant with respect to y:
∫₁³ x y dy = x ∫₁³ y dy = x [y²/2]₁³ = x(9/2 − 1/2) = x·(8/2) = 4x.
Step 4: Integrate with respect to x.
∫₀² 4x dx = [2x²]₀² = 2·4 = 8.
Insight: When the region is a rectangle, the main conceptual step is interpreting ρ as “mass per unit area.” The integral adds up tiny masses ρ(x,y) dA.
A multiple integral is a single number representing accumulation of a function over a region in ℝ² (dA) or ℝ³ (dV).
The differential element dA or dV encodes the “infinitesimal patch/box” being summed; in Cartesian coordinates dA = dx dy and dV = dx dy dz.
Setting up correct bounds (describing the region) is often harder than performing the integrations.
Iterated integrals compute multiple integrals by integrating one variable at a time; the inner integral treats outer variables as constants.
Order matters for setup: the same region can require one integral or a piecewise split depending on whether you use dy dx or dx dy.
Area and volume are special cases: ∬_D 1 dA = Area(D) and ∭_E 1 dV = Volume(E).
For solids between z = z₁(x,y) and z = z₂(x,y), volume can be computed as ∬_D (z₂ − z₁) dA.
Writing bounds that don’t match the region (e.g., using constant limits when the boundary is curved, or forgetting to restrict the outer variable’s range).
Swapping the order (dx dy ↔ dy dx) without rewriting the bounds to describe the same region, often leading to incorrect answers.
Forgetting that the inner integral treats the outer variable(s) as constants (e.g., incorrectly integrating x as if it depended on y).
Confusing geometric volume with signed integral when f changes sign; ∬_D f dA can be negative even if the region is positive area.
Compute ∬_D (2x) dA over the rectangle D = { (x,y): 0 ≤ x ≤ 3, −1 ≤ y ≤ 2 }.
Hint: Integrate in y first: ∫_{−1}^2 2x dy = 2x(2−(−1)).
Set up:
∬_D 2x dA = ∫₀³ ∫_{−1}^2 2x dy dx.
Inner integral:
∫_{−1}^2 2x dy = 2x[y]_{−1}^2 = 2x(3) = 6x.
Outer:
∫₀³ 6x dx = [3x²]₀³ = 27.
Let D be the triangle with vertices (0,0), (2,0), (2,3). Compute ∬_D 1 dA (the area) using an iterated integral.
Hint: Describe the slanted edge as a line from (0,0) to (2,3): y = (3/2)x. Use 0 ≤ x ≤ 2 and 0 ≤ y ≤ (3/2)x.
The line through (0,0) and (2,3) is y = (3/2)x.
A Type I description is:
0 ≤ x ≤ 2,
0 ≤ y ≤ (3/2)x.
Then
Area(D) = ∬_D 1 dA = ∫₀² ∫₀^{(3/2)x} 1 dy dx.
Inner:
∫₀^{(3/2)x} 1 dy = (3/2)x.
Outer:
∫₀² (3/2)x dx = (3/2)[x²/2]₀² = (3/2)·(4/2) = (3/2)·2 = 3.
Compute the volume of E = { (x,y,z): 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, 0 ≤ y ≤ 1, 0 ≤ z ≤ x + y }.
Hint: Use ∭_E 1 dV and integrate dz first, then over the unit square in (x,y).
Volume = ∭_E 1 dV = ∫₀¹ ∫₀¹ ∫₀^{x+y} 1 dz dy dx.
Inner:
∫₀^{x+y} 1 dz = x + y.
So
Volume = ∫₀¹ ∫₀¹ (x + y) dy dx.
Integrate in y:
∫₀¹ (x + y) dy = [xy + y²/2]₀¹ = x + 1/2.
Integrate in x:
∫₀¹ (x + 1/2) dx = [x²/2 + x/2]₀¹ = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1.